C’est sous la devise « œuvrer pour la paix » (pursuing peace) et non « faire la paix » (making peace) que s’est tenu le sommet d’Anchorage qui a réuni en Alaska le Président des Etats-Unis et le Président de la Russie. Par inclination, les média occidentaux ont insisté sur la déclaration du Président de l’État hôte alors qu’il apparaît important de considérer la façon dont le Président Poutine a abordé ce sommet.
C’est pourquoi IMDGEO estime utile de donner le texte brut des déclarations des deux chefs d’État.
Le président russe a parlé en premier, ce qui déroge à l’usage diplomatique selon lequel le chef de l’État hôte s’exprime tout d’abord, il a parlé aussi plus longuement, huit minutes, tandis que le président américain a parlé deux fois moins longtemps. Il s’agissait d’une fausse conférence de presse, les présidents n’ayant pas répondu aux questions des journalistes. Il est vrai que le sommet dénote une certaine improvisation malgré le protocole très précis et les démonstrations aéronautiques au-dessus de la base aérienne d’Elmendorf-Richardson. Il n’a pas été préparé de façon approfondie. En l’absence d’ambassadeur américain à Moscou, seule la visite à Moscou de M. Steve Witkoff, émissaire personnel du Président Trump, a jeté les bases de la réunion. Lors du sommet les éventuelles concessions territoriales redoutées par les Européens n’ont pas été évoquées, semble-t-il, non plus qu’un cessez-le-feu. Cependant, il ne s’agirait que d’une première rencontre puisque le Président Poutine a invité le Président Trump à poursuivre les discussions à Moscou. En somme, le président russe a retrouvé sa place sur la scène internationale en dépit des poursuites de la Cour pénale internationale.
Il est frappant de constater que, malgré les propos péremptoires de leurs dirigeants, les États européens sont totalement absents de cette amorce de négociation qui ne vise pas un cessez-le-feu mais bien un accord de paix. Le Président de la République française a déclaré depuis Brégançon, « fort diplomatique » : « Il est très important que l’Europe soit entendue avant un tel rendez-vous …Nous sommes en train, progressivement, de devenir une puissance géostratégique. En tout cas, c’est ce que nous voulons. » Ce sont là de forts propos qui dissimulent mal la faiblesse de la prétendue diplomatie européenne. Déjà au sommet de l’OTAN, l’inanité de l’influence européenne fut symbolisée par le mot malencontreux du secrétaire général Mark Rutte appelant Donald Trump « papa…tu restes toujours avec la famille ? ». En réalité, les Européens, loin de pouvoir jouer un rôle de médiateurs dans le conflit ukrainien se sont alignés dès l’origine sur les positions américaines du Président Biden au point que leur soutien financier et militaire au gouvernement de Kiev en fait des « belligérants » et non des puissances neutres ; le concept maladroit de « co-belligérants » utilisé par les commentateurs et parfois par les dirigeants politiques n’a aucune existence en droit international : il n’est donc pas de mise mais de fait il ne permet pas de se tourner vers l’Europe comme puissance médiatrice. Ce n’est pas Madame von der Layen qui n’a juridiquement ni la compétence ni politiquement la légitimité pour engager les États de l’Union qui pourrait se substituer aux gouvernements des Etats membres en la matière.
Jean-Yves de Cara
Vladimir Putin:
Mr. President, ladies and gentlemen. Our negotiations have been held in a constructive atmosphere of mutual respect. We had very thorough discussions that were quite useful. I would like to thank, once again, my American counterpart for the proposal to travel out here to Alaska.
It only makes sense that we have met here, because our countries, though separated by the ocean, are close neighbors. When I arrived, I said, “Good afternoon, dear neighbor. Very good to see you in good health, and to see you alive.” I think that is very neighborly, and I believe those are some kind words we can say to each other.
We are separated by the Bering Strait, yet there are two islands—one Russian, one American—only four kilometers apart. We are indeed close neighbors, and that is a fact. It is also important that Alaska represents our common heritage and history, with many positive connections between Russia and the U.S. There is tremendous cultural heritage from Russian America—for example, Orthodox churches and more than 700 geographical names of Russian origin.
During the Second World War, it was here in Alaska that the legendary air bridge began, supplying military aircraft and other equipment under the Lend-Lease program. It was a dangerous and treacherous route over the vast emptiness of ice. However, the pilots of both countries did everything they could to bring victory closer. They risked their lives, and they gave it all for our common triumph.
Recently, I was in the city of Magadan in Russia, where there is a memorial dedicated to both Russian and U.S. pilots. Two flags fly there—the U.S. flag and the Russian flag. I know that here in Alaska, too, there is such a memorial, with a military burial site several kilometers from here, where Soviet pilots are buried who died during that dangerous mission. We are grateful to the citizens and the government of the United States for carefully preserving their memory. That is very worthy and noble.
We will always remember other historical examples when our countries defeated common enemies together in the spirit of battle camaraderie and fellowship. I am sure that this heritage will help us rebuild and foster mutually beneficial and equal ties at this new stage, even under the hardest conditions.
It is well known that there have been no summits between Russia and the U.S. for four years—a long time. Relations have fallen to the lowest point since the Cold War. That benefits neither our countries nor the world as a whole. Sooner or later, we had to amend the situation, to move on from confrontation to dialogue.
In this case, a personal meeting between the heads of state was long overdue. Naturally, this required serious and painstaking work—and this work has been done. President Trump and I have very good, direct contact. We have spoken multiple times, frankly, over the phone. His special envoy, Mr. Witkoff, traveled to Russia several times. Our advisors and foreign ministers kept in touch regularly.
As you know, one of the central issues was the situation around Ukraine. We see the effort of the administration and of President Trump personally to help facilitate a resolution of the conflict, and his determination to get to the crux of the matter, to understand its history. This is precious, because the situation in Ukraine relates to fundamental threats to our security.
Moreover, we have always considered the Ukrainian nation a brotherly nation. However strange it may sound under current conditions, we share the same roots. Everything that is happening is a tragedy for us—a terrible wound. Therefore, Russia is sincerely interested in putting an end to it.
At the same time, we are convinced that in order for the settlement to be lasting, we must eliminate the root causes of the conflict. We have said many times that all legitimate concerns of Russia must be considered, and a just balance of security reinstated in Europe and in the world as a whole. I agree with President Trump, who has said today that naturally, the security of Ukraine should be ensured as well. We are prepared to work on that.
I hope that the agreements we have reached together will help bring us closer to that goal, paving the path towards peace in Ukraine. We expect that Kyiv and European capitals will perceive this constructively, and that they will not throw a wrench into the works, nor attempt provocations to torpedo nascent progress.
Incidentally, since the new administration came to power, bilateral trade has begun to grow. It is still symbolic, but we have seen growth of 20 percent. As I said, there are many dimensions for joint work. U.S.-Russian investment and business cooperation has tremendous potential—in trade, digital technology, high-tech industries, and space exploration. Arctic cooperation is also very possible, particularly between the Russian Far East and the U.S. West Coast.
It is very important for our countries to turn the page and return to cooperation. Symbolically, not far from here, on the border between Russia and the U.S., lies the so-called International Date Line. You can literally step from yesterday into tomorrow. I hope we will succeed in doing that politically as well.
I would like to thank President Trump for our joint work, and for the well-wishing and trustworthy tone of our conversation. It is important that both sides are result-oriented. The President of the U.S. has a very clear idea of what he wants to achieve. He sincerely cares about the prosperity of his nation, and he understands that Russia has its own national interests.
I expect that today’s agreements will be the starting point not only for resolving the Ukrainian issue, but also for bringing back businesslike and pragmatic relations between Russia and the U.S.
In conclusion, I would like to add one more thing. In 2022, during my last contact with the previous administration, I tried to convince my American colleague that the situation should not be brought to the point of no return, leading to hostilities. He accepted directly back then that it was a big mistake.
Today, President Trump has said that if he had been president at that time, there would have been no war. I am quite sure that is true. I can confirm that. I believe that overall, President Trump and I have built a very good, businesslike, and trustworthy contact. We have every reason to believe that by continuing down this path, we can bring the conflict in Ukraine to an end.
Thank you.
Donald Trump :
Well, thank you very much, Mr. President. That was very profound. I will say that I believe we had a very productive meeting.
There were many points that we agreed on—most of them, I would say. A couple of big ones we haven’t quite finalized yet, but we have made headway. There is no deal until there is a deal. I will call NATO in a little while. I will call up the various people I think appropriate, and of course President Zelensky, to tell him about today’s meeting.
Ultimately, it is up to them. They have to agree, along with Marco, Steve, and some of the great people from the Trump administration who came here—Scott, John Ratcliffe. Thank you very much. We have some of our really great leaders here, doing a phenomenal job.
We also have tremendous Russian business representatives present, and I think everyone wants to deal with us. We have become the hottest country anywhere in the world in a very short period of time, and we look forward to that. We look forward to dealing. We’re going to try to get this over with.
We made great progress today. I’ve always had a fantastic relationship with President Putin—with Vladimir. We had many tough meetings, but also many good ones.
We were interfered with by the “Russia, Russia, Russia” hoax, which made it tougher to deal with him. But he understood it. I think he has probably seen things like that during the course of his career—he’s seen it all. But we had to put up with the Russia hoax. He knew it was a hoax, and I knew it was a hoax. What was done was very criminal, but it made it harder for us to deal as a country in terms of business and all the other things we wanted to address.
Now, we will have a good chance when this is over. To put it quickly: I’m going to start making a few phone calls to tell people what happened. But it was an extremely productive meeting. Many points were agreed upon, with only a very few left unresolved. Some are not very significant; one is probably the most significant. But we have a very good chance of getting there.
I would like to thank President Putin and his entire team—faces I know in many cases, faces I see all the time in the newspapers. You’re almost as famous as the boss—especially this one right over here. But we have had good, productive meetings over the years, and I hope to have more in the future.
But let’s focus on making this the most productive one yet. We are going to stop five, six, seven thousand people a week from being killed, and President Putin wants that as much as I do.
So again, Mr. President, thank you very much. We’ll speak very soon, and probably see each other again very soon. Thank you very much, Vladimir.
Vladimir Putin: Next time in Moscow
Donald Trump: That’s an interesting one. I might get a little heat on that, but I could see it possibly happening. Thank you very much, Vladimir. And thank you all.
